Skip to content

Give us this day our daily bread…

The importance of the humble loaf of bread in Georgian diets is hard to imagine. Out of my ancestor’s household expenses in 1796 totalling just over one hundred pounds for the whole year, a quarter was paid to the butcher but the next main supplier was the baker, at roughly 20% of total outgoings. (Interestingly, vegetables were not bought at any time in the year – they were either home-grown or not consumed at all!).

Richard Hall’s diaries are therefore full of details about the price of bread – and he was horrified at the way grain prices rocketed in the final years of the century, as war with France caused rampant inflation.

As a younger man he would regularly cut out the newspaper notices of the approved prices for bread (they were regulated at the local Assizes). His early interest may have been because he had farming interests in the Cotswolds: naturally he wanted to know what price different cereal crops were fetching. In peacetime the main buyers of grain  were the millers, for producing flour.

 

 

 

Come wartime and the sale of beer increased, forcing barley prices up as the brewers competed with the millers. The millers wanted the grain harvested earlier than the brewers, so farmers needed to second-guess which way the market would go. And of course, farmers expected to be paid “on the nail” ( a reference to the “nails” in Bristol, circular-topped pedestals where samples of the grain were laid out for inspection in front of the Corn Exchange).

One of the nails in Bristol’s Corn Street, shown courtesy of Wikipedia

Wheat was expensive, and dishonest bakers looked to  make it go further by adding all sorts of unpleasant things to the dough – The London Art of Cookery, and Housekeeper’s Complete Assistant (1787) warns that “In the adulteration of flour, mealmen and bakers have been known to use bean-meal, chalk, whiting, slacked lime, alum and even ashes of bones”  and then goes on to give ways of detecting whether chalk, jalap (a purgative) or other adulterants have been added. And as for the alum – let’s just say that when a means of producing it in Britain was found in 1607, it involved not just Alum shale, wood, coal, seaweed but also … quantities of human urine. The latter was so essential and required in such quantities that the urine was shipped in barrels from London to Yorkshire, where the alum was manufactured at a factory in Whitby.

One foreign visitor to London in 1748 was a man called Pehr Kaln. In his  Account of His Visit to England  he wrote: “The bread which here in England was everywhere and exclusively used, at least where I travelled, was large loaves, baked of wheat-flour. Other bread is next to never eaten. Most Englishmen had rarely heard tell of rye-bread; few had seen it, and still fewer were those who had eaten it. Many also did not know, that anyone was in the habit of baking bread of rye, but they thought that it was only used as food for cattle. This ought to be understood of those who lived in London and the provinces immediately round; for several told me that in the north of England it is common enough to bake bread of rye-meal. Likewise that there are large tracts in the north where most of the people mostly live on Haver-bread [oatmeal cakes].”

Maybe things changed in the ensuing fifty years, because by 1805 Edlin’s “A Treatise on the Art of Bread-Making”  was giving readers all manner of different grains and produce which could be adapted for bread making – rice, acorns, even potatoes. I had no idea anyone would try and make bread from such things! And while we are on the subject of bread substitutes I feel it is appropriate to add in a Gillray cartoon, dated 1795 and entitled “Substitutes for Bread.” The list on the wall suggests that venison, roast beef and poultry are all acceptable alternatives – for the rich! The poor can just go without (in an echo of “let them eat cake”).

Gillray caricature shown courtesy of British Museum
Diderot’s picture of the inside of the bake house

Edlin’s  treatise explained about the actual bakery: “A bakehouse is a manufactory where bread is made for the purposes of sale. In order to render it convenient, it should be attached to the dwelling house, and have an inner door opening into the kitchen, and likewise an outer door to open into a small yard. In this yard there ought to be a well or pump, as also a shed for the piling of faggots. The room should be large and commodious, and the floor laid with stone or tiles. On one side should be erected a dresser or counter, with suitable shelves above it; on another side a kneading trough, about seven feet long, three feet high, two feet and a half broad at top, and sixteen inches at bottom, with a sluice board to pen the dough up at one end, and a lid to shut down like that of a box. On the third side a copper that will contain from three to four pails of water should be erected, which is far preferable to the filthy custom of heating the water in the oven; and on the fourth side the oven should be placed.”

Diderot had earlier published his Encyclopédie with a section on the Boulanger  and this includes a picture of the tools of his trade.

 

 

 

 

In several of the houses I have owned there were still working bread ovens in the kitchen. It would have been the cook’s job to get the oven hot enough for baking, by burning twigs in the oven. On reaching the required temperature the remaining twigs and ashes were raked out, the dough inserted, and the iron door closed. Once baking was finished the twigs to be used the following day would be put into the oven as it cooled down, so that the twigs were bone dry and flammable for the next day’s baking.

And as for the recipe for making bread in the eighteenth century, look no further than Encyclopaedia Britannica, which in its 1771 edition informed the reader:

“The meal, ground and bolted, is put into a trough, and to every bushel are poured in about three pints of warm ale, with barm and salt to season it: this is kneaded well together with the hands through the brake; or for want thereof, with the feet, through a cloth; after which, having lain an hour to swell, it is moulded into manchets, which scorched in the middle, and pricked at the top, to give room to rise, are baked in the oven by a gentle fire.”  Mmm, I am not sure that I want my bread moulded into manchets if the baker has been kneading it with his feet!

These pictures show the actual bread sellers at work on the streets (in France, on the left; in Germany, on the right).

   

 

 

 

1 thought on “Give us this day our daily bread…”

  1. Pingback: Loyalist Trails 2023-34 – UELAC

Leave a Reply